I mean, the behavior of the community speaks for itself. They try so hard not being the thing they ran from three years ago, but in the midst of their attempt, they end up evolving into the very thing they ran from. Its like they just didn’t like being on the platform of origin, promised they’d do better, then realizing how separated they are to where they just recreated it by instinct.

Power-Tripping Mods, Gaslighting Users, Immature Moderators, 100 Rules to follow but contradicts itself .etc

I can just go on and on and on. Oh and I don’t even care about this stupid debate that happened between .ML and .World because there’s virtually no difference and it is just nothing but a sissy online slapfight.

  • Nytefyre@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yeah but there’s a distinct difference and you can tell a Reddit-like way of moderating within a mile. They just can’t handle pretty much anything and they act moreso on their own personal belief, even believing their own interpretation of the rules they set up and expect people to follow than the actual reality of the matter.

    A normal functioning moderator wouldn’t cater to every little pettiness and resort to prissy levels.

    • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Unpaid moderators should have the freedom to act according to their personal preferences. If moderation becomes a problem, the platform’s federated structure also facilitates creating alternative communities.