The Fediverse is growing and we have decently successful platforms like Lemmy and Mastodon. What else would you like to see?

Any big tech platform not yet replaced or maybe something new altogether? What are we missing?

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    Any city/county/state/federal (or your countrys equivalent) running their own fediverse servers (especially Mastodon) instead of simply having a twitter handle.

    • folekaule@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not so sure I want them to self host, just based on their track record for security, but I would like them to be more visible.

      Also news outlets could benefit from doing this instead of us having to rely on repost automation.

      I would also love to see peertube become more competitive to YouTube. It would probably need some kind of revenue sharing model or donation integration for that though.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I agree about the self hosted part. That part isn’t important. But an @city.mastodon server is better than an @city on twitter username. The important part is getting them off proprietary platforms.

        Like how they all do email and websites now.

        • naught101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Probably someone needs to start a service aimed at them, like a mastodon instance called localgov.social or something

        • folekaule@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yep. That’s what I meant. I want them to come to the fediverse but I don’t necessarily want the city’s IT admin to manage it between fighting laser printers.

            • folekaule@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Agreed. I don’t think I explained myself clearly enough: I want them to have a presence online. Among the reasons being exactly what you’re pointing out. However, I think at least for smaller cities with very little staff, it’s not realistic to ask them to literally self-host it (as in having a server on-prem running it). I would be fine with them outsourcing it or cloud-hosting it under their own domain. A potential solution for the small ones could be something like a state-level hosted service where municipalities can sign up and get their own accounts, for example. That would work even for something like Rittman, Ohio pop. 6,131.